This is a continuation from the previous post here.
What we must face and admit, is that when we are only thinking of ourselves and holding ourselves and our actions to different standards than we hold others, that if we can look at who we are within doing that, that we have essentially made ourself an enemy of who we are acting against. That within that, we are the criminal, because we have justified doing harm to another that we would not accept to be done to ourself by another, and thus we cause our own problems through our own disregard of each other.
This solution to inequality is simply not taught, because it’s not ‘good for business’ for those that would profit from the system the way it is, and thus why it is a point of self-education to correct the misinformation we are instilled with. I suggest to investigate the Living Income Guaranteed, which shows that there is another way we can do things here, which is based on the very principle of to ‘do unto another as you’d have done unto you’, or, in other words, to ‘give as you would like to receive’, which really means to break out of the misconception of considering oneself in opposition to all others, and to consider all beings as equal to you.
As Howard Zinn discusses in this interview Howard Zinn - Hidden History of The American Working Class how the education system actually presents this very one-sided picture of the U.S. where they take what has been a very violent and exploitative history (and still ongoing) and twists it into a pretty picture, where all the actions of the U.S. are apparently justified, and the actions of all other countries are unacceptable, even when it is the same or not even as extreme, as the very actions of the U.S. unto other countries. This education, which is reinforced by our media and Hollywood, is what predominantly shapes our lopsided value-system. Watch this fascinating documentary Hollywood and the war machine to see how Hollywood has been deliberately utilized as propaganda to drive wars.
I myself was a product of the disinformation of what we learn in the education system and how the media presents things, because it was all I knew at one point. And I never questioned it until I was faced with different sides of the story, for example if you would read The People’s History of the United States by Howard Zinn, probably one of the most important history lessons you will ever have.
And I must say that although I practically never enjoyed the history classes I had in school, I loved reading this, because it was not meaningless and detached and full of holes like the history I learned in school, where history is simply not taught in a way that would typically engage a student, because you are essentially being told the way things are but given no real honest explanation, or for that matter, any consideration of the consequences of what we’ve done throughout our history. I mean history is quite commonly thought of as an extremely boring and annoying subject, and that works out quite well from those who would benefit from the mass of the population not knowing really anything about history or having any interest in it whatsoever, because that is how you can get away with using the same control tactics again and again. I mean, if no one remembers what happened before, we won’t be watching out for it again, and that’s how we fall for the same old stories and ideas that become the justifications that lead us into war, which is a very profitable business for some.
Within all this, I eventually accepted the justifications myself, that apparently we have enemies and thus must fight them and we’re ‘protecting’ ourselves. I was so sold on the idea that apparently there were these vicious enemies out there who were big and posed some sort of real threat to us and so we just had to protect ourselves. Yet, I had no idea actually how bid any of these countries were, or how developed they are, and probably most importantly why do they apparently want to attack us? I mean, for me to want to attack someone, it took a reason. I had to believe that they were a threat to me or harmed me in some way. So, wouldn’t that hold true for the supposed ‘enemies’ as well? I mean, I knew they are people, human beings, just like me. Same bodies with superficial differences, and you’ve got moms and dads and children, etc. They all need the same things as me like food, water, shelter, education. Sure we have some cultural differences, though those are usually blown out of proportion by the media, in order to highlight our apparent differences, to feed the idea and misperception that there could be human beings out there that are ‘just different’ and just want to harm us for no good reason, and so we won’t ever realize that nobody just wants to hurt others, and we’ll never investigate or question to get to the bottom of what is really going on, as such behavior is always the symptom of something out of ordinary going on.
We’ll go up to here for this post and continue in the next.
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Day 206: Noam Chomsky and U.S. Exceptionalism
Chomsky: US drone campaign is world's biggest terrorist action (EXCLUSIVE)
In watching this recent interview with Noam Chomsky, he speaks about ‘exceptionalism’ and how every great power at some point claims exception for their deeds, for deeds which would not be acceptable or legal on a universal scale. Chomsky mentions a case involving the apprehension of an individual in Libya, and where the Secretary of State was asked in a press conference whether this was legal, and he stated that it’s legal; it’s in accord with American law. Chomsky points out that this obviously doesn’t mean that it is in accordance with international law. For example, obviously other countries are not going to have laws that state that the U.S. can come into another country and just take who they like.
How is it that we’ve come to accept this kind of duplicity
or ‘double standard’ to take place at a governmental level? It’s because we
have accepted it within ourselves; we live this at an individual level. We do
this very same thing within our individual daily lives, where we justify our
actions regardless of the fact that our actions weren’t in the actual consideration
of what is best for everyone, and whether our actions are what would be
acceptable if they were, for example, done to ourselves.
Basically, we’ve missed the boat on living according to the
principle of Jesus’ message, which is to ‘do unto another as you’d have done
unto you’. We have instead come up with all sorts of exceptions, excuses,
justifications, reasons, as to why we apparently had to take some action the
likes of which we would never want done to ourselves. And through this, we
create enemies of each other, just like we do at the national scale as
countries, as Chomsky points out as well, that our ‘justified’ drone strikes
are busy creating lots of enemies.
No wonder the drone strike movement is taking place – it’s Great for business. Because it ensures a
fresh and constant stream of enemies that we’ll always have to spend lots of
money on defense systems to apparently protect ourselves from, despite the fact
that most of the apparent ‘threats’ out there, really don’t pose any threat in
comparison to the ‘might’ of the U.S., which is actually the current predominant
‘threat’ in the world, causing all sorts of terror, in the very name of a ‘war on
terror’.
What it always comes down to is money, and the control of
money, and therefore we are going to hear whatever excuse is necessary to
justify continuing war and invasion and destruction of societies, to keep that
business booming. But we as individuals have got to sort ourselves out, so that
we can begin to recognize when we are hearing justifications, which means
sorting out when we ourselves are using justifications to excuse our own
behaviors.
What it comes down to is a practical re-education for
ourselves, because we really have never lived in any other way other than only
considering ourself and what is apparently best for ourself, and it’s always
been a me vs. everyone else out there kind of situation. I mean, you can really
see this within relationships such as friendships where despite the premise
being that you’re in a relationship where you’re nice and friendly and look out
for each other, there is often really a lot of nastiness that goes on behind
others backs, usually within the idea that one is just ‘looking out for oneself’.
You also see this in a lot of relationships between family members as well,
where things can get really vindictive. There are some popular TV series out
there that really exemplify our dysfunction in relationships.
The re-education point is where we realize that there is
another way to exist, than me against everyone else. That if we don’t sort
ourselves out, our relationships are only going to get more consequential, on
the personal and global scale, which is already quite escalated. So, it’s not
to judge and say how horrible or evil we are because we are nasty to each
other, but rather to understand that when we’re only considering ourselves as
if we’re the only ones that really exist, and applying a double standard, where
we can excuse our actions, and yet expect another to not do the same, that this
is consequential and is the very reason that we have ourselves entrenched still
in wars and the extreme harm of each other and our environment. And, thus, that
only considering ourselves is actually not ending up resulting in an outcome
that is best for ourself after all, but is leading to a world of consequence
where children are not safe to play in the streets, where you cannot trust one
another, where we must have locks on our doors and our possessions, where you
don’t want to be out late at night on city streets. I mean, why would we accept
a world where it is not safe everywhere, in every single nook and cranny?
On that note, we’ll go up to here for this blog post, and
continue in the next.
For those interesting in sorting oneself out, there is the Free DIP Lite course that offers a streamlined approach to the process with one-on-one assistance throughout the course.
Related articles
Day 464: It's Getting Hot in Here...
Consumerism Teaches Us to Value Our Own Destruction over Life: DAY 237
Day 458: Failed Country, Failed World
All Countries should ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention - 488
Oil and Pipeline Geopolitics: The US-NATO Race for Syria's Black Gold
Day 417 - Belief and self Part 5
Are the Values We Proclaim to Have, Our Real Values? DAY 235
Day 204: Is Cheaper Always Better? Is There Any Consequence To Cheap Prices?
We’ve got an obsession with cheap
prices, and it’s so ingrained in, we seem to hardly even be aware
of it. But Walmart is an perfect example of this – where the whole
premise is (supposed to be) cheap prices. I say supposed to be,
because not all the prices are cheap, other items that we might not
notice, are hiked up to essentially make up for the difference of the
other products which are cheaper.
In this article
about the ‘google glass’, 'Could
Google Glass revive the high street? One third of Britons say they
would use it to hunt for bargains (but admit they'd be embarrassed to
wear it)', individuals said they would mostly use it to
compare prices while shopping. To see if the product they’re
looking to buy isn’t available cheaper somewhere else. Which is
interesting that it’s never questioned – but how is it possible?
To have the exact same product be different prices? What changed?
And this article
about Amazon.com, 'Amazon
accused of bullying small firms and inflating prices - the truth
about the world's biggest retailer' exposes
that Amazon’s prices aren’t always the cheapest, and showing the
price wars that have occurred where companies will adopt price
matching policies. Which again it’s not questioned why aren’t
prices made the same in the first place? Stores were implementing
these price matching or even undercutting methods, in order to get
more customers to buy from their stores rather than just using their
store as essentially a showroom to test out what they’ll buy for
cheaper online.
Basically, we’ve accepted the idea that ‘we want cheap prices’. And this seems to make sense because, for the majority of us, we have low wages. Wages that don’t afford us to be able to buy all the things that make life livable and comfortable and worthwhile. And therefore, we think we need to find everything as cheap as we possibly can.
However, we haven’t been looking at the big picture – what does all these low prices mean? Can we have low prices but have quality products as well? These products being sold for so cheap – how much do the workers that supply the labor get paid? Do they get paid less if the prices are marked down?
The thing is – by always seeking the cheap prices, we put companies in a position where they have to continuously compete to have the cheapest prices, and what this means is the sacrifice of the quality of the product, and also a cheapening of the labor, which means workers having to do more for less, and if you’ll notice, that is exactly what is going on at large, where jobs are paying less and less, despite inflation going up. Even though many wages have simply remained stagnant, you can actually say they have lowered, because there are less higher paying jobs available and more lower paying jobs, so overall you can say the wages have in fact lowered. And that is just here in the U.S. This is the same also abroad in many countries that have don’t even have the very limited protection of the labor laws that exists currently in the U.S, (which really don't afford much and are mostly to protect the interest of employers anyway).What you see happening in the most abundant jobs which is for example retail and food service jobs that make up a high percentage of the bulk of jobs in the U.S., is that they are purposely understaffed as much as possible, which means that the employees that are there must work even harder, though this does not mean any increase in their remuneration.
So you have to work harder, for less, and the result is that as inflation goes up and wages stagnate or drop, you can buy less and less. And so you want the products to be cheaper and cheaper and cheaper and it will never end, because they can never be cheap enough, but the products become cheaper and cheaper, which means less effective, and so as your wages go down, so you can afford less, the quality of that which you can afford goes down and down, so we are now buying things that break very fast and must be replaced on a constant and regular basis. While, if you are one of the few who could afford much higher priced higher quality items, the items will last much longer and you will have to replace it much less, and in the end those with the money will have actually spent less, than those who must buy the cheaper inferior products and replace them over and over.
So you can see the vicious cycle that is in play – the more we want cheaper products, the more our wages and the value of our labor goes down, and therefore, the less we can afford to buy, and products have to get even cheaper, and even more degraded, which then devalues our labor even more, so – when would this end? Obviously you could see that it does not end. Until that is, when we reach the point that the products would become so inferior and we would be so poor that we would not bother to buy them, and then businesses will collapse, there’ll really be no jobs, and essentially the economy would have tanked.
Boy, who wants to live in that reality? Many already do today in countries whose economies have crashed, and those of us who have paid attention and noticed that and read the news stories to see what that would be like, know – we do not want to go down that road.
So, we’ve got to realize the ‘bigger-picture’, in the consequence we’re causing for ourselves by so extensively sticking to this ‘cheaper is better’ idea, because it is not actually so. Our quality of life goes down, the quality of the products we can buy goes down, and it’s a viscous cycle down and down.
The way to get ourself out of this cycle is to have pricing required to be structured in such a way that all points of a products creation, as the labor that has gone into making it in all aspects of production, is properly accounted for, meaning that it is sufficient to cover costs and provide all labor involved adequate compensation enough to be able to afford a dignified and proper living, which means being able to afford quality products. To ensure effective pricing, the pricing should be disclosed as to what exactly is included in the price and how much, so that it is transparent and therefore easy for all to see exactly what we're paying for, and that effective remuneration is happening.
And this would lead to the result of all products being of the best quality, rather than of cheaper and cheaper quality, because we’ll be able to afford better quality, so we won’t put pressure on companies to be the cheapest, we can instead focus on the quality of products, and therefore the quality of our lives.
For a quality living with quality
products and to stop the cheapening of our lives support the Living
Income Guaranteed at http://basicincome.me
Related articles
Day 241: Will Inflation be a Problem with Providing a Living Income Guaranteed?
Day 244: Transforming Currency into Money with Living Income Guaranteed
Day 197: Minimum Wage Falls Short - What Can We Do?
Day 451: The Tap Planned Obsolescence within Basic Income Guaranteed
Day 456: Inflation and the Living Income Guaranteed
Let's Face It, Most of Us Love Cheap Clothes -- and Don't Think Much About Whether Child Slave...
Day 407: Givez me some Minimalism
Day 460: Transhumanism: the Rise of the Machine - Part 1
Labels:
Amazon.com,
bargains,
basic income,
cheap,
discounts,
google glass,
living income,
living wage,
low prices,
low wage,
marked down,
minimum wage,
Price war,
pricing,
retail jobs,
Shopping,
United States,
walmart
Day 196: The 4th of July - Are We Really Independent?
Last night
I listened to the fireworks that were being set off somewhere rather quite
nearby, as I could hear quite distinctly the sounds of the combustion burning
up in the air like to quite some detail. The loud bangs and hissing and whistling
went on for a few hours. From where I was, lying in bed, I did not see any
flashing lights, all I heard was the sounds. Sounds like those you would hear
in warfare, and it would be bombs and missiles, and there would probably also
be the element of the sound of things breaking and being busted accompanying
the loud blasts. As I lay there, I allowed myself to really question why we do
this, why do we have a celebration where we blast fake bombs into the sky with flashy lights, and really have a look at just what it is we’re doing, how we react to this event,
what we get out of it, what’s our relationship to/with it? Does it make sense, or is it really extremely bizarre?
It’s as if
through this display, a big fanfare of energetic blasts it’s as if to say, ‘everything’s
fine, everything’s alright, look we’re doing so ok that we can celebrate, I mean,
we wouldn’t celebrate if things weren’t ok right? Our society and economy obviously
must be stable and going along just fine if we’re able to put on such a
display, right?
Yet meanwhile
all the same problems are still going on in the world, as is. Everything is obviously
not fine, and bombs are dropping in places where such sounds are scaring the
living shit out of people because such sounds are the sounds of bombs and
missiles and mean you could die at any moment, or have yourself be blasted apart
or who knows what atrocity.
I used to
see the 4th of July as a positive thing, but it was really my imagination
about it, as the idea I had of it, as how it was presented to me as a child,
and I associated it with positive things, like holiday from school, you get to
play and everybody is putting on a good mood, and there is cheesecake or pie or
some such yummy thing you get to indulge in. And it is something different from
the ‘norm’, a break from the ‘day to day’ same-old routine- not realizing that
such things are like ‘coping mechanisms’ which assist us to ‘put up with’ the
day to day drudgery by giving a little break from it for a moment so it doesn’t
seem so bad, and then I can continue on just waiting til the next break. And I
learned to associate positivity to the U.S., and the American flag, like ‘hooray
for our team!’, like the positive feeling that’s associated with sports and teams
and winning and being proud of ‘your team’ because ‘you’ve won’ and so all
these things that I’d associated as positive through memories, is what I was
really seeing the 4th of July as/through - I was just reliving the
experiences and feelings of those previous memories and experiences, and not
actually seeing it for and as what/how it really is, in the context of reality and what is really going on in the world.
Now when
you just look at it in actuality for what it is, it’s really quite a pompous
act from a country who has done such extensive harm in the world, perhaps the
most out of any country, with its people brainwashed enough to think it is the
greatest country while it has rained down so much terror on the world, with it’s
‘war on terror’ which is really a war of
terror, because we are really the terror, that tears this world apart through force
and fear, tears apart humanity by wreaking such harm to terrorize us and drive
us further and further apart, from who we are as equals here, from standing
together and living together in unison, which I mean, I though it was called
the ‘united’ states but there is nothing about actual ‘unity’ about it – it is
about the destruction of unity, it is about one country that unites together to
cause untold harm in apparently protecting its own self-interest, which it then
celebrates with fake bombs, celebrating the real
bombs and warfare and harm that did
not actually procure our freedom, but served to make a few a lot of money,
while many have fought and suffered and died in unnecessary wars that were only
ever for the greed of a few, because war is not how you gain ‘independence’, war
is in fact how we have caused dependence
of the countries we ravage that now can’t stand on their own and require
assistance.
There has been numerous cases of this which are documented
throughout history and it still goes on today, you just will not find it in the
mainstream media, as that is privately owned and the information it puts out is
controlled to shape a rather different version of reality, which is how we can
end up thinking the U.S. is great despite the reality that is actually going on
and that others are experiencing the consequences of first hand. For some education on this suggest to watch the documentary The War on Democracy.
It’s quite a
reflection of our general total disregard for life here as we don’t consider
what effect this event of blowing things up for no reason might have on all the
other beings that exist here, or using the up the finite resources of the earth
which we are already squandering excessively putting more and more pressure on
our overburdened ecosystem, but just impose our celebration because we want it
and we only care about ourselves and our own feel-good experience, and we don’t
even know what impact this might have on the environment or how this may effect
for example animals that are sensitive to sounds. I mean, for example, the cat that
I take care of and who is sensitive to loud sounds and events did not come home
to be fed until well after all the explosions had stopped, so she was quite
likely hiding somewhere terrified and very hungry, but so often we are only
thinking about ourselves at all, just existing within our imagination
throughout the day in our own separate reality bubble, where the beings you
interact with you don’t even consider them as beings equal to yourself, but
they are just mere actors or props in your play in your mind that you are the
star of, just like in hollywood. Stuck in the memories and feelings of past experiences,
ignorant to the effect we’re having in reality, the harm we’re causing through
attempting to live out our imagination onto reality, where if we would but simply
look at what we’re doing and the effect we’re having we would see it, and so
our ignorance is really just an illusion as it’s all happening right here in
front of us.
The ironic
thing is - we actually have no independence, whatsoever. Our living, our
lifestyle, it all is dependent on many many individuals who are not even U.S.
citizens, as in all the outsourced slave labor which we depend upon daily for
so much of our products that we utilize in all aspects of our lives and living.
How can we pretend/think/believe we have independence when you don’t even know
where the food in your grocery store comes from, or who made the shirt you’re
wearing, where dividends on your investments come from – somewhere individuals
are doing labor that provides these things, and you are depending on them. We
live off of the labor of others while taking them totally for granted at the
same time, ignoring the fact that there are millions and billions enslaved
while we go and celebrate how the U.S. has managed to create so many slaves for
us to provide us with all sorts of consumer products, which we then become
enslaved so that we can buy buy buy. It’s the American Dream isn’t it?
So we are
not independent, we’re interdependent, because we all live here on this same
planet. Interdependence is not a problem, it is the fact that we are all
connected within this shared reality and all living here together, and thus
what one do effects all, and thus within this we must ensure that what we do
and what we support is harming no one because that will have consequences in a
shared reality.
And when we
are also totally dependent on our ecosystem to live – yet we trash it and
disregard it as if we had some form of independence from it. Yet without the
resources that the earth provides unconditionally, your body would not be
supported and your body would die and you would be gone, and that is about as
dependent as you can get. Within this, implies that we must then take the
utmost care of our ecosystem and each other in a way that is best for all life.
I mean,
when we get to that point, that would really be something to celebrate. When we
get to the point where the best life is a basic human right for everyone.
![]() | ||||
| Basic Income Guaranteed |
Suggested reading:
Patriotism vs. Solving Global Problems
Basic Income Guaranteed and Human Rights
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















