This is a continuation from the previous post here.
What we must face and admit, is that when we are only thinking of ourselves and holding ourselves and our actions to different standards than we hold others, that if we can look at who we are within doing that, that we have essentially made ourself an enemy of who we are acting against. That within that, we are the criminal, because we have justified doing harm to another that we would not accept to be done to ourself by another, and thus we cause our own problems through our own disregard of each other.
This solution to inequality is simply not taught, because it’s not ‘good for business’ for those that would profit from the system the way it is, and thus why it is a point of self-education to correct the misinformation we are instilled with. I suggest to investigate the Living Income Guaranteed, which shows that there is another way we can do things here, which is based on the very principle of to ‘do unto another as you’d have done unto you’, or, in other words, to ‘give as you would like to receive’, which really means to break out of the misconception of considering oneself in opposition to all others, and to consider all beings as equal to you.
As Howard Zinn discusses in this interview Howard Zinn - Hidden History of The American Working Class how the education system actually presents this very one-sided picture of the U.S. where they take what has been a very violent and exploitative history (and still ongoing) and twists it into a pretty picture, where all the actions of the U.S. are apparently justified, and the actions of all other countries are unacceptable, even when it is the same or not even as extreme, as the very actions of the U.S. unto other countries. This education, which is reinforced by our media and Hollywood, is what predominantly shapes our lopsided value-system. Watch this fascinating documentary Hollywood and the war machine to see how Hollywood has been deliberately utilized as propaganda to drive wars.
I myself was a product of the disinformation of what we learn in the education system and how the media presents things, because it was all I knew at one point. And I never questioned it until I was faced with different sides of the story, for example if you would read The People’s History of the United States by Howard Zinn, probably one of the most important history lessons you will ever have.
And I must say that although I practically never enjoyed the history classes I had in school, I loved reading this, because it was not meaningless and detached and full of holes like the history I learned in school, where history is simply not taught in a way that would typically engage a student, because you are essentially being told the way things are but given no real honest explanation, or for that matter, any consideration of the consequences of what we’ve done throughout our history. I mean history is quite commonly thought of as an extremely boring and annoying subject, and that works out quite well from those who would benefit from the mass of the population not knowing really anything about history or having any interest in it whatsoever, because that is how you can get away with using the same control tactics again and again. I mean, if no one remembers what happened before, we won’t be watching out for it again, and that’s how we fall for the same old stories and ideas that become the justifications that lead us into war, which is a very profitable business for some.
Within all this, I eventually accepted the justifications myself, that apparently we have enemies and thus must fight them and we’re ‘protecting’ ourselves. I was so sold on the idea that apparently there were these vicious enemies out there who were big and posed some sort of real threat to us and so we just had to protect ourselves. Yet, I had no idea actually how bid any of these countries were, or how developed they are, and probably most importantly why do they apparently want to attack us? I mean, for me to want to attack someone, it took a reason. I had to believe that they were a threat to me or harmed me in some way. So, wouldn’t that hold true for the supposed ‘enemies’ as well? I mean, I knew they are people, human beings, just like me. Same bodies with superficial differences, and you’ve got moms and dads and children, etc. They all need the same things as me like food, water, shelter, education. Sure we have some cultural differences, though those are usually blown out of proportion by the media, in order to highlight our apparent differences, to feed the idea and misperception that there could be human beings out there that are ‘just different’ and just want to harm us for no good reason, and so we won’t ever realize that nobody just wants to hurt others, and we’ll never investigate or question to get to the bottom of what is really going on, as such behavior is always the symptom of something out of ordinary going on.
We’ll go up to here for this post and continue in the next.
Day 206: Noam Chomsky and U.S. Exceptionalism
Chomsky: US drone campaign is world's biggest terrorist action (EXCLUSIVE)
In watching this recent interview with Noam Chomsky, he speaks about ‘exceptionalism’ and how every great power at some point claims exception for their deeds, for deeds which would not be acceptable or legal on a universal scale. Chomsky mentions a case involving the apprehension of an individual in Libya, and where the Secretary of State was asked in a press conference whether this was legal, and he stated that it’s legal; it’s in accord with American law. Chomsky points out that this obviously doesn’t mean that it is in accordance with international law. For example, obviously other countries are not going to have laws that state that the U.S. can come into another country and just take who they like.
How is it that we’ve come to accept this kind of duplicity
or ‘double standard’ to take place at a governmental level? It’s because we
have accepted it within ourselves; we live this at an individual level. We do
this very same thing within our individual daily lives, where we justify our
actions regardless of the fact that our actions weren’t in the actual consideration
of what is best for everyone, and whether our actions are what would be
acceptable if they were, for example, done to ourselves.
Basically, we’ve missed the boat on living according to the
principle of Jesus’ message, which is to ‘do unto another as you’d have done
unto you’. We have instead come up with all sorts of exceptions, excuses,
justifications, reasons, as to why we apparently had to take some action the
likes of which we would never want done to ourselves. And through this, we
create enemies of each other, just like we do at the national scale as
countries, as Chomsky points out as well, that our ‘justified’ drone strikes
are busy creating lots of enemies.
No wonder the drone strike movement is taking place – it’s Great for business. Because it ensures a
fresh and constant stream of enemies that we’ll always have to spend lots of
money on defense systems to apparently protect ourselves from, despite the fact
that most of the apparent ‘threats’ out there, really don’t pose any threat in
comparison to the ‘might’ of the U.S., which is actually the current predominant
‘threat’ in the world, causing all sorts of terror, in the very name of a ‘war on
terror’.
What it always comes down to is money, and the control of
money, and therefore we are going to hear whatever excuse is necessary to
justify continuing war and invasion and destruction of societies, to keep that
business booming. But we as individuals have got to sort ourselves out, so that
we can begin to recognize when we are hearing justifications, which means
sorting out when we ourselves are using justifications to excuse our own
behaviors.
What it comes down to is a practical re-education for
ourselves, because we really have never lived in any other way other than only
considering ourself and what is apparently best for ourself, and it’s always
been a me vs. everyone else out there kind of situation. I mean, you can really
see this within relationships such as friendships where despite the premise
being that you’re in a relationship where you’re nice and friendly and look out
for each other, there is often really a lot of nastiness that goes on behind
others backs, usually within the idea that one is just ‘looking out for oneself’.
You also see this in a lot of relationships between family members as well,
where things can get really vindictive. There are some popular TV series out
there that really exemplify our dysfunction in relationships.
The re-education point is where we realize that there is
another way to exist, than me against everyone else. That if we don’t sort
ourselves out, our relationships are only going to get more consequential, on
the personal and global scale, which is already quite escalated. So, it’s not
to judge and say how horrible or evil we are because we are nasty to each
other, but rather to understand that when we’re only considering ourselves as
if we’re the only ones that really exist, and applying a double standard, where
we can excuse our actions, and yet expect another to not do the same, that this
is consequential and is the very reason that we have ourselves entrenched still
in wars and the extreme harm of each other and our environment. And, thus, that
only considering ourselves is actually not ending up resulting in an outcome
that is best for ourself after all, but is leading to a world of consequence
where children are not safe to play in the streets, where you cannot trust one
another, where we must have locks on our doors and our possessions, where you
don’t want to be out late at night on city streets. I mean, why would we accept
a world where it is not safe everywhere, in every single nook and cranny?
On that note, we’ll go up to here for this blog post, and
continue in the next.
For those interesting in sorting oneself out, there is the Free DIP Lite course that offers a streamlined approach to the process with one-on-one assistance throughout the course.
Related articles
- Day 464: It's Getting Hot in Here...
- Consumerism Teaches Us to Value Our Own Destruction over Life: DAY 237
- Day 458: Failed Country, Failed World
- All Countries should ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention - 488
- Oil and Pipeline Geopolitics: The US-NATO Race for Syria's Black Gold
- Day 417 - Belief and self Part 5
- Are the Values We Proclaim to Have, Our Real Values? DAY 235
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)